On Thu, 2017-05-11 at 12:57 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Face the fact, there are Display Port sink and branch devices out there
> in the wild that don't follow the Display Port specifications, or they
> have bugs, or just otherwise require special treatment. Start a common
> quirk database the driv
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Personally I don't think enums should be used for defining bits, because
> they are not enumerations. The bits are usually combined to come up with
> values that are not part of the enum.
>
> If we added the quirks to struct intel_dp_desc (and
On Thu, 11 May 2017, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 12:57:20PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> Face the fact, there are Display Port sink and branch devices out there
>> in the wild that don't follow the Display Port specifications, or they
>> have bugs, or just otherwise require spec
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 12:57:20PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Face the fact, there are Display Port sink and branch devices out there
> in the wild that don't follow the Display Port specifications, or they
> have bugs, or just otherwise require special treatment. Start a common
> quirk database t
On 05/11/2017 02:57 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
Face the fact, there are Display Port sink and branch devices out there
in the wild that don't follow the Display Port specifications, or they
have bugs, or just otherwise require special treatment. Start a common
quirk database the drivers can query b
Face the fact, there are Display Port sink and branch devices out there
in the wild that don't follow the Display Port specifications, or they
have bugs, or just otherwise require special treatment. Start a common
quirk database the drivers can query based on OUI (with the option of
expanding to de
