Reviewed-by: Lyude
On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 15:25 -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> Mahesh Kumar is already working on a proper implementation for the
> workaround, but while we still don't have it, let's just
> unconditionally apply the workaround for everybody and we hope we can
> close all those numer
Mahesh Kumar is already working on a proper implementation for the
workaround, but while we still don't have it, let's just
unconditionally apply the workaround for everybody and we hope we can
close all those numerous bugzilla tickets. Also, I'm not sure how easy
it will be to backport the final i
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 01:54:09PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Oct 2016, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:34:14AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >> On Mon, 10 Oct 2016, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> >> The patch is a bit on the large side for stable. 100 lines with context
> >> is th
On Tue, 11 Oct 2016, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:34:14AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Mon, 10 Oct 2016, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
>> The patch is a bit on the large side for stable. 100 lines with context
>> is the rule.
>
> Huh? It's only 49 line of changes:
>
>> > drivers/gpu/drm
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:34:14AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Oct 2016, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> > Mahesh Kumar is already working on a proper implementation for the
> > workaround, but while we still don't have it, let's just
> > unconditionally apply the workaround for everybody and we
On Mon, 10 Oct 2016, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> Mahesh Kumar is already working on a proper implementation for the
> workaround, but while we still don't have it, let's just
> unconditionally apply the workaround for everybody and we hope we can
> close all those numerous bugzilla tickets. Also, I'm no
I feel like the PRMs should be a little less confusing so it doesn't
take four of us reading it to actually get the full spec into code…
Anyway, while this is going to be running on more then just skylake I
feel like intel_needs_memory_bw_wa() is a little confusing since I
would expect eventually
Em Seg, 2016-10-10 às 16:34 -0400, Lyude Paul escreveu:
> Was there a new workaround added recently? Or was this something I
> just
> missed when writing the original code for this
It's listed on the public spec:
https://01.org/sites/default/files/docum
entation/intel-gfx-prm-osrc-skl-vol12-displa
Was there a new workaround added recently? Or was this something I just
missed when writing the original code for this
On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 17:30 -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> Mahesh Kumar is already working on a proper implementation for the
> workaround, but while we still don't have it, let's j
Mahesh Kumar is already working on a proper implementation for the
workaround, but while we still don't have it, let's just
unconditionally apply the workaround for everybody and we hope we can
close all those numerous bugzilla tickets. Also, I'm not sure how easy
it will be to backport the final i
10 matches
Mail list logo
