On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 12:34:34PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> So there's 3 competing proposals for what wait_ioctl should do wrt
> -EIO:
>
> - return -EIO when the gpu is wedged. Not terribly useful for
> userspace since it might race with a hang and then there's no
> guarantee that a
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 09:50:25AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 09:20:02AM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 10:13:10AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 09:04:23AM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 09:20:02AM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 10:13:10AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 09:04:23AM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 09:28:08AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 09:28:08AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 10:11:12AM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 12:34:34PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > So there's 3 competing proposals for what wait_ioctl should do wrt
> > > -EIO:
> > >
> > > -
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 09:04:23AM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 09:28:08AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 10:11:12AM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 12:34:34PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > So there's 3 competing
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 10:13:10AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 09:04:23AM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 09:28:08AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 10:11:12AM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 10:11:12AM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 12:34:34PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > So there's 3 competing proposals for what wait_ioctl should do wrt
> > -EIO:
> >
> > - return -EIO when the gpu is wedged. Not terribly useful for
> > userspace
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 12:34:34PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> So there's 3 competing proposals for what wait_ioctl should do wrt
> -EIO:
>
> - return -EIO when the gpu is wedged. Not terribly useful for
> userspace since it might race with a hang and then there's no
> guarantee that a
So there's 3 competing proposals for what wait_ioctl should do wrt
-EIO:
- return -EIO when the gpu is wedged. Not terribly useful for
userspace since it might race with a hang and then there's no
guarantee that a subsequent execbuf won't end up in an -EIO.
Terminally wedge really can only