On 8/26/2015 5:21 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 05:20:36PM +0530, Sivakumar Thulasimani wrote:
From: "Thulasimani,Sivakumar"
This patch reads sink_count dpcd always and removes its
read operation based on values in downstream port dpcd. Also
we should read it irrespective
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 05:20:36PM +0530, Sivakumar Thulasimani wrote:
> From: "Thulasimani,Sivakumar"
>
> This patch reads sink_count dpcd always and removes its
> read operation based on values in downstream port dpcd. Also
> we should read it irrespective of current status of sink.
>
> SINK_C
On 8/26/2015 3:17 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2015, Sivakumar Thulasimani
wrote:
From: "Thulasimani,Sivakumar"
This patch reads sink_count dpcd always and removes its
read operation based on values in downstream port dpcd. Also
we should read it irrespective of current status of
On Tue, 25 Aug 2015, Sivakumar Thulasimani
wrote:
> From: "Thulasimani,Sivakumar"
>
> This patch reads sink_count dpcd always and removes its
> read operation based on values in downstream port dpcd. Also
> we should read it irrespective of current status of sink.
Having to write "also" in a co
From: "Thulasimani,Sivakumar"
This patch reads sink_count dpcd always and removes its
read operation based on values in downstream port dpcd. Also
we should read it irrespective of current status of sink.
SINK_COUNT dpcd is not dependent on DOWNSTREAM_PORT_PRESENT dpcd.
SINK_COUNT denotes if a d
