On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 05:29:44PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
Please ignore this full series here.
I have a better one that let PSR on HSW in a better stage with only 1 idle
frame and without changing the 100ms. Actually if we are brave we can
reduce this to 24 or less. The new work is
Please ignore this full series here.
I have a better one that let PSR on HSW in a better stage with only 1 idle
frame and without changing the 100ms. Actually if we are brave we can
reduce this to 24 or less. The new work is currently under
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 05:40:05PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
Here goes results on BDW with pure today's nightly (with idle_frame=1)
# First run
IGT-Version: 1.7-gd4b43f0 (x86_64) (Linux: 3.17.0-rc2+ x86_64)
Subtest primary_page_flip: SUCCESS
Subtest primary_mmap_gtt: SUCCESS
Test
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 10:49:56PM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
With Software tracking we are going to PSR sooner than we should and staying
with blank screens in many cases.
Using 2 identical frames to detect idleness is safier.
This idle frame detection still depends of FBC right?
I believe
On Thu, 04 Sep 2014, Rodrigo Vivi rodrigo.v...@intel.com wrote:
With Software tracking we are going to PSR sooner than we should and staying
with blank screens in many cases.
Using 2 identical frames to detect idleness is safier.
Discovered and validated with refactored igt/kms_sink_psr_crc.
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 10:49:56PM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
With Software tracking we are going to PSR sooner than we should and staying
with blank screens in many cases.
Using 2 identical frames to detect idleness is safier.
Discovered and validated with refactored igt/kms_sink_psr_crc.
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 10:55:16AM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 10:49:56PM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
With Software tracking we are going to PSR sooner than we should and staying
with blank screens in many cases.
Using 2 identical frames to detect idleness is
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 11:29:16AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 10:55:16AM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 10:49:56PM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
With Software tracking we are going to PSR sooner than we should and
staying
with blank screens
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 01:04:27PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 11:29:16AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 10:55:16AM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 10:49:56PM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
With Software tracking we are going
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 01:18:19PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 01:04:27PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 11:29:16AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 10:55:16AM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 10:49:56PM
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 12:55 AM, Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 10:49:56PM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
With Software tracking we are going to PSR sooner than we should and
staying
with blank screens in many cases.
Using 2 identical frames to
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 1:09 AM, Jani Nikula jani.nik...@linux.intel.com
wrote:
On Thu, 04 Sep 2014, Rodrigo Vivi rodrigo.v...@intel.com wrote:
With Software tracking we are going to PSR sooner than we should and
staying
with blank screens in many cases.
Using 2 identical frames to
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 2:22 AM, Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch wrote:
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 10:49:56PM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
With Software tracking we are going to PSR sooner than we should and
staying
with blank screens in many cases.
Using 2 identical frames to detect idleness
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 3:04 AM, Ville Syrjälä ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com
wrote:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 11:29:16AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 10:55:16AM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 10:49:56PM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
With Software
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 4:04 AM, Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch wrote:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 01:18:19PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 01:04:27PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 11:29:16AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Rodrigo Vivi rodrigo.v...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 2:22 AM, Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch wrote:
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 10:49:56PM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
With Software tracking we are going to PSR sooner than we should and
staying
with
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch wrote:
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Rodrigo Vivi rodrigo.v...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 2:22 AM, Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch wrote:
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 10:49:56PM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
With
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:16 PM, Rodrigo Vivi rodrigo.v...@gmail.com wrote:
Hm, I don't see a pattern at all. And that sprites seem to work best
also looks funky. Are the results stable when you randomize them
(piglit can do that for you)? Can you add a residency checks in the
testcase (i.e.
Here goes results on BDW with pure today's nightly (with idle_frame=1)
# First run
IGT-Version: 1.7-gd4b43f0 (x86_64) (Linux: 3.17.0-rc2+ x86_64)
Subtest primary_page_flip: SUCCESS
Subtest primary_mmap_gtt: SUCCESS
Test assertion failure function test_crc, file kms_psr_sink_crc.c:307:
Failed
With Software tracking we are going to PSR sooner than we should and staying
with blank screens in many cases.
Using 2 identical frames to detect idleness is safier.
Discovered and validated with refactored igt/kms_sink_psr_crc.
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi rodrigo.v...@intel.com
---
20 matches
Mail list logo
