Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/chv: Remove Wait for a previous gfx force-off

2015-03-11 Thread Deepak S
On Thursday 26 February 2015 09:12 PM, Deepak S wrote: On Thursday 26 February 2015 09:13 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote: On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 08:46:54PM +0530, deepa...@linux.intel.com wrote: From: Deepak S deepa...@linux.intel.com On CHV, PUNIT team confirmed that 'VLV_GFX_CLK_STATUS_BIT' is

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/chv: Remove Wait for a previous gfx force-off

2015-02-26 Thread deepak . s
From: Deepak S deepa...@linux.intel.com On CHV, PUNIT team confirmed that 'VLV_GFX_CLK_STATUS_BIT' is not a sticky bit and it will always be set. So ignore Check for previous Gfx force off during suspend and allow the force clk as part S0ix Sequence Signed-off-by: Deepak S

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/chv: Remove Wait for a previous gfx force-off

2015-02-26 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 08:46:54PM +0530, deepa...@linux.intel.com wrote: From: Deepak S deepa...@linux.intel.com On CHV, PUNIT team confirmed that 'VLV_GFX_CLK_STATUS_BIT' is not a sticky bit and it will always be set. So ignore Check for previous Gfx force off during suspend and allow the

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/chv: Remove Wait for a previous gfx force-off

2015-02-26 Thread Deepak S
On Thursday 26 February 2015 09:13 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote: On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 08:46:54PM +0530, deepa...@linux.intel.com wrote: From: Deepak S deepa...@linux.intel.com On CHV, PUNIT team confirmed that 'VLV_GFX_CLK_STATUS_BIT' is not a sticky bit and it will always be set. So ignore