Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/10] drm/i915: Leave FDI running after failed link training on LPT-H

2015-12-04 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 11:09:11AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 03:08:41PM +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote: > > From: Ville Syrjälä > > > > Currently we disable some parts of FDI setup after a failed link > > training. But

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/10] drm/i915: Leave FDI running after failed link training on LPT-H

2015-12-04 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 03:08:41PM +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > Currently we disable some parts of FDI setup after a failed link > training. But despite that we continue with the modeset as if everything > is fine. This

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/10] drm/i915: Leave FDI running after failed link training on LPT-H

2015-12-03 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 03:16:56PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > 2015-12-01 11:08 GMT-02:00 : > > From: Ville Syrjälä > > > > Currently we disable some parts of FDI setup after a failed link > > training. But despite that we continue

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/10] drm/i915: Leave FDI running after failed link training on LPT-H

2015-12-02 Thread Paulo Zanoni
2015-12-01 11:08 GMT-02:00 : > From: Ville Syrjälä > > Currently we disable some parts of FDI setup after a failed link > training. But despite that we continue with the modeset as if everything > is fine. This results in tons of

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/10] drm/i915: Leave FDI running after failed link training on LPT-H

2015-12-01 Thread ville . syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä Currently we disable some parts of FDI setup after a failed link training. But despite that we continue with the modeset as if everything is fine. This results in tons of noise from the state checker, and it means we're not following the proper