On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 11:09:11AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 03:08:41PM +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä
> >
> > Currently we disable some parts of FDI setup after a failed link
> > training. But
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 03:08:41PM +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> Currently we disable some parts of FDI setup after a failed link
> training. But despite that we continue with the modeset as if everything
> is fine. This
On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 03:16:56PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> 2015-12-01 11:08 GMT-02:00 :
> > From: Ville Syrjälä
> >
> > Currently we disable some parts of FDI setup after a failed link
> > training. But despite that we continue
2015-12-01 11:08 GMT-02:00 :
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> Currently we disable some parts of FDI setup after a failed link
> training. But despite that we continue with the modeset as if everything
> is fine. This results in tons of
From: Ville Syrjälä
Currently we disable some parts of FDI setup after a failed link
training. But despite that we continue with the modeset as if everything
is fine. This results in tons of noise from the state checker, and
it means we're not following the proper