Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/38] drm/i915: Remove highly confusing i915_gem_obj_ggtt_pin()

On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 11:43:57AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 05:55:25PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Since i915_gem_obj_ggtt_pin() is an idiom breaking curry function for > > i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin(), spare us the confustion and remove it. > > Removing it now

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/38] drm/i915: Remove highly confusing i915_gem_obj_ggtt_pin()

On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 05:55:25PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > Since i915_gem_obj_ggtt_pin() is an idiom breaking curry function for > i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin(), spare us the confustion and remove it. > Removing it now simplifies later patches to change the i915_vma_pin() > (and friends)

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/38] drm/i915: Remove highly confusing i915_gem_obj_ggtt_pin()

Since i915_gem_obj_ggtt_pin() is an idiom breaking curry function for i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin(), spare us the confustion and remove it. Removing it now simplifies later patches to change the i915_vma_pin() (and friends) interface. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson ---