Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/12] drm/i915: Assert that VRR is off during vblank evasion if necessary

2023-09-15 Thread Golani, Mitulkumar Ajitkumar
> -Original Message- > From: Intel-gfx On Behalf Of Ville > Syrjala > Sent: 01 September 2023 18:35 > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/12] drm/i915: Assert that VRR is off during > vblank evasion if necessary > > From: Ville Syrjälä > > Whenever we

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/12] drm/i915: Assert that VRR is off during vblank evasion if necessary

2023-09-07 Thread Manasi Navare
Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare Manasi On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at 6:05 AM Ville Syrjala wrote: > > From: Ville Syrjälä > > Whenever we change the actual transcoder timings (clock via > seamless M/N, full modeset, (or soon) vtotal via LRR) we > want the timing generator to be in non-VRR during the

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/12] drm/i915: Assert that VRR is off during vblank evasion if necessary

2023-09-01 Thread Ville Syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä Whenever we change the actual transcoder timings (clock via seamless M/N, full modeset, (or soon) vtotal via LRR) we want the timing generator to be in non-VRR during the commit. Warn if we forgot to turn VRR off prior to vblank evasion. Cc: Manasi Navare Signed-off-by: