Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/43] drm/i915/bdw: Don't write PDP in the legacy way when using LRCs

2014-08-11 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 01:17:40PM +0100, Thomas Daniel wrote: From: Oscar Mateo oscar.ma...@intel.com This is mostly for correctness so that we know we are running the LR context correctly (this is, the PDPs are contained inside the context object). v2: Move the check to inside the

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/43] drm/i915/bdw: Don't write PDP in the legacy way when using LRCs

2014-08-08 Thread Damien Lespiau
On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 01:17:40PM +0100, Thomas Daniel wrote: From: Oscar Mateo oscar.ma...@intel.com This is mostly for correctness so that we know we are running the LR context correctly (this is, the PDPs are contained inside the context object). v2: Move the check to inside the

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/43] drm/i915/bdw: Don't write PDP in the legacy way when using LRCs

2014-08-07 Thread Thomas Daniel
From: Oscar Mateo oscar.ma...@intel.com This is mostly for correctness so that we know we are running the LR context correctly (this is, the PDPs are contained inside the context object). v2: Move the check to inside the enable PPGTT function. The switch happens in two places: the legacy context

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/43] drm/i915/bdw: Don't write PDP in the legacy way when using LRCs

2014-08-01 Thread Damien Lespiau
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 05:04:20PM +0100, Thomas Daniel wrote: From: Oscar Mateo oscar.ma...@intel.com This is mostly for correctness so that we know we are running the LR context correctly (this is, the PDPs are contained inside the context object). v2: Move the check to inside the