On 20/10/17 10:22, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Chris Wilson (2017-10-19 20:44:41)
Quoting Michał Winiarski (2017-10-19 19:36:18)
With GuC, we're scheduling tasklet on USER_INTERRUPT - since some work
has completed, perhaps we're able to submit some more work. We're doing
similar thing for
Quoting Chris Wilson (2017-10-19 20:44:41)
> Quoting Michał Winiarski (2017-10-19 19:36:18)
> > With GuC, we're scheduling tasklet on USER_INTERRUPT - since some work
> > has completed, perhaps we're able to submit some more work. We're doing
> > similar thing for preemption - after preemption has
Quoting Michał Winiarski (2017-10-19 19:36:18)
> +#define GUC_LOST_IRQ_WORK_DELAY_MS 100
> +static void guc_lost_user_interrupt(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> + struct guc_preempt_work *preempt_work =
> + container_of(to_delayed_work(work), typeof(*preempt_work),
> +
Quoting Michał Winiarski (2017-10-19 19:36:18)
> With GuC, we're scheduling tasklet on USER_INTERRUPT - since some work
> has completed, perhaps we're able to submit some more work. We're doing
> similar thing for preemption - after preemption has completed, it's time
> to schedule the tasklet and
With GuC, we're scheduling tasklet on USER_INTERRUPT - since some work
has completed, perhaps we're able to submit some more work. We're doing
similar thing for preemption - after preemption has completed, it's time
to schedule the tasklet and submit more work (since the engine is now
idle).
