Op 12-08-2020 om 21:14 schreef Thomas Hellström (Intel):
>
> On 8/10/20 12:30 PM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> Instead of doing everything inside of pin_mutex, we move all pinning
>> outside. Because i915_active has its own reference counting and
>> pinning is also having the same issues vs
On 8/10/20 12:30 PM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
Instead of doing everything inside of pin_mutex, we move all pinning
outside. Because i915_active has its own reference counting and
pinning is also having the same issues vs mutexes, we make sure
everything is pinned first, so the pinning in
Instead of doing everything inside of pin_mutex, we move all pinning
outside. Because i915_active has its own reference counting and
pinning is also having the same issues vs mutexes, we make sure
everything is pinned first, so the pinning in i915_active only needs
to bump refcounts. This allows
