We have the ordering of timeline->mutex vs resv_lock wrong,
convert the i915_pin_vma and intel_context_pin as well to
future-proof this.
We may need to do future changes to do this more transaction-like,
and only get down to a single i915_gem_ww_ctx, but for now this
should work.
Signed-off-by:
We have the ordering of timeline->mutex vs resv_lock wrong,
convert the i915_pin_vma and intel_context_pin as well to
future-proof this.
We may need to do future changes to do this more transaction-like,
and only get down to a single i915_gem_ww_ctx, but for now this
should work.
Signed-off-by:
We have the ordering of timeline->mutex vs resv_lock wrong,
convert the i915_pin_vma and intel_context_pin as well to
future-proof this.
We may need to do future changes to do this more transaction-like,
and only get down to a single i915_gem_ww_ctx, but for now this
should work.
Signed-off-by:
We have the ordering of timeline->mutex vs resv_lock wrong,
convert the i915_pin_vma and intel_context_pin as well to
future-proof this.
We may need to do future changes to do this more transaction-like,
and only get down to a single i915_gem_ww_ctx, but for now this
should work.
Signed-off-by:
We have the ordering of timeline->mutex vs resv_lock wrong,
convert the i915_pin_vma and intel_context_pin as well to
future-proof this.
We may need to do future changes to do this more transaction-like,
and only get down to a single i915_gem_ww_ctx, but for now this
should work.
Signed-off-by:
