Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/dp: Remove eDP special cases from bandwidth checks

2012-05-10 Thread Chris Wilson
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 13:29:18 -0400, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, 2011-10-14 at 23:13 -0700, Keith Packard wrote: On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 12:43:50 -0400, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote: These were just working around the math being wrong. One wonders whether this might

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/dp: Remove eDP special cases from bandwidth checks

2012-05-10 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 07:40:23PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 13:29:18 -0400, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, 2011-10-14 at 23:13 -0700, Keith Packard wrote: On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 12:43:50 -0400, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote: These were just

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/dp: Remove eDP special cases from bandwidth checks

2011-10-15 Thread Keith Packard
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 12:43:50 -0400, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote: These were just working around the math being wrong. One wonders whether this might break some machines which are currently working. Should we emit an error or something if an eDP panel asks for the impossible? --

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/dp: Remove eDP special cases from bandwidth checks

2011-10-14 Thread Adam Jackson
These were just working around the math being wrong. Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 20 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c