On 26/04/16 15:00, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 09:29:42AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 08:31:07AM +0100, Dave Gordon wrote:
On 22/04/16 19:51, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 07:45:15PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 09:29:42AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 08:31:07AM +0100, Dave Gordon wrote:
> > On 22/04/16 19:51, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > >On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 07:45:15PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > >>On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 07:22:55PM +0100, Dave Gordon
On 26/04/16 11:35, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 10:52:41AM +0100, Dave Gordon wrote:
On 26/04/16 09:49, Dave Gordon wrote:
On 25/04/16 11:39, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:07:13AM +0100, Dave Gordon wrote:
On 22/04/16 19:45, Chris Wilson wrote:
[snip]
And
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 10:52:41AM +0100, Dave Gordon wrote:
> On 26/04/16 09:49, Dave Gordon wrote:
> >On 25/04/16 11:39, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >>On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:07:13AM +0100, Dave Gordon wrote:
> >>>On 22/04/16 19:45, Chris Wilson wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> And what exactly is that
On 26/04/16 09:49, Dave Gordon wrote:
On 25/04/16 11:39, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:07:13AM +0100, Dave Gordon wrote:
On 22/04/16 19:45, Chris Wilson wrote:
[snip]
And what exactly is that atomic64_cmpxchg() serialising with? There are
no other CPUs contending with the
On 25/04/16 11:39, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:07:13AM +0100, Dave Gordon wrote:
On 22/04/16 19:45, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 07:22:55PM +0100, Dave Gordon wrote:
This patch simply changes the default value of "enable_guc_submission"
>from 0 (never) to -1
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:07:13AM +0100, Dave Gordon wrote:
> On 22/04/16 19:45, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 07:22:55PM +0100, Dave Gordon wrote:
> >>This patch simply changes the default value of "enable_guc_submission"
> >>from 0 (never) to -1 (auto). This means that GuC
On 22/04/16 19:45, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 07:22:55PM +0100, Dave Gordon wrote:
This patch simply changes the default value of "enable_guc_submission"
from 0 (never) to -1 (auto). This means that GuC submission will be
used if the platform has a GuC, the GuC supports the
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 08:31:07AM +0100, Dave Gordon wrote:
> On 22/04/16 19:51, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 07:45:15PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >>On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 07:22:55PM +0100, Dave Gordon wrote:
> >>>This patch simply changes the default value of
On 22/04/16 19:51, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 07:45:15PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 07:22:55PM +0100, Dave Gordon wrote:
This patch simply changes the default value of "enable_guc_submission"
from 0 (never) to -1 (auto). This means that GuC submission
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 07:45:15PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 07:22:55PM +0100, Dave Gordon wrote:
> > This patch simply changes the default value of "enable_guc_submission"
> > from 0 (never) to -1 (auto). This means that GuC submission will be
> > used if the platform
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 07:22:55PM +0100, Dave Gordon wrote:
> This patch simply changes the default value of "enable_guc_submission"
> from 0 (never) to -1 (auto). This means that GuC submission will be
> used if the platform has a GuC, the GuC supports the request submission
> protocol, and any
This patch simply changes the default value of "enable_guc_submission"
from 0 (never) to -1 (auto). This means that GuC submission will be
used if the platform has a GuC, the GuC supports the request submission
protocol, and any required GuC firmwware was successfully loaded. If any
of these
13 matches
Mail list logo
