On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 09:31:55PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 04:54:01PM -0800, Matt Roper wrote:
> > Try to be more consistent about intel_* types rather than drm_* types
> > for lower-level driver functions. While we're at it, let's also be more
> > consistent with sta
On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 04:54:01PM -0800, Matt Roper wrote:
> Try to be more consistent about intel_* types rather than drm_* types
> for lower-level driver functions. While we're at it, let's also be more
> consistent with state variable naming (half of the platforms use the
> name 'state' wherea
Try to be more consistent about intel_* types rather than drm_* types
for lower-level driver functions. While we're at it, let's also be more
consistent with state variable naming (half of the platforms use the
name 'state' whereas the other half used 'crtc_state').
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper
---