Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: enable W=1 warnings by default

2023-10-10 Thread Jani Nikula
On Fri, 06 Oct 2023, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 03:34:47PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: >> We enable a bunch more compiler warnings than the kernel >> defaults. However, they've drifted to become a unique set of warnings, >> and have increasingly fallen behind from the W=1

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: enable W=1 warnings by default

2023-10-06 Thread Nathan Chancellor
On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 03:34:47PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > We enable a bunch more compiler warnings than the kernel > defaults. However, they've drifted to become a unique set of warnings, > and have increasingly fallen behind from the W=1 set. > > Align with the W=1 warnings from

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: enable W=1 warnings by default

2023-10-06 Thread kernel test robot
://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-tip drm-tip patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/f50c8ea0e63615aea28fe7f6049703e1d28ba7eb.1696595500.git.jani.nikula%40intel.com patch subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: enable W=1 warnings by default config: x86_64-rhel-8.3-rust (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: enable W=1 warnings by default

2023-10-06 Thread Jani Nikula
We enable a bunch more compiler warnings than the kernel defaults. However, they've drifted to become a unique set of warnings, and have increasingly fallen behind from the W=1 set. Align with the W=1 warnings from scripts/Makefile.extrawarn for clarity, by copy-pasting them with