Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: generate address mode bit from PPGTT instance

2016-04-26 Thread Wang, Zhi A
Hi Matthew: Thanks for spending efforts on rebase! :) I'm sorry that we will drop this 2 patches in the next round patch review. In the previous discussion, there were two options: Option A. Unify GVT-g PPGTT shadow with i915 PPGTT routines, which needs these 2 patches, then LRC

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: generate address mode bit from PPGTT instance

2016-04-26 Thread Chris Wilson
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 04:17:52PM +0100, Matthew Auld wrote: > From: "Wang, Zhi A" > > After the per-PPGTT address mode gets support, the LRC submission should > generate the address mode bit from PPGTT instance, instead of the > hard-coded system configuration. > > v2: >

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: generate address mode bit from PPGTT instance

2016-04-26 Thread Matthew Auld
From: "Wang, Zhi A" After the per-PPGTT address mode gets support, the LRC submission should generate the address mode bit from PPGTT instance, instead of the hard-coded system configuration. v2: (Matthew Auld) - rebase on latest -nightly Cc: Chris Wilson