Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: hsw+ audio regs are per-transocder

2019-05-02 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 03:16:37PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Tue, 30 Apr 2019, Ville Syrjala wrote: > > From: Ville Syrjälä > > > > s/pipe/transcoder/ when dealing with hsw+ audio registers. This > > won't actually make any real difference since there is no audio > > on the EDP transcoder.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: hsw+ audio regs are per-transocder

2019-05-02 Thread Jani Nikula
On Tue, 30 Apr 2019, Ville Syrjala wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > s/pipe/transcoder/ when dealing with hsw+ audio registers. This > won't actually make any real difference since there is no audio > on the EDP transcoder. But this should avoid a bit of confusion > when cross checking against

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: hsw+ audio regs are per-transocder

2019-04-30 Thread Ville Syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä s/pipe/transcoder/ when dealing with hsw+ audio registers. This won't actually make any real difference since there is no audio on the EDP transcoder. But this should avoid a bit of confusion when cross checking against the spec. Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä ---