Hi Ram,
On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 07:46:11PM +0530, Ramalingam C wrote:
> From: Matthew Auld
>
> LMEM should be allocated at 64K granularity, since 4K page support will
> eventually be dropped for LMEM when using the PPGTT.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld
> Signed-off-by: Stuart Summers
>
From: Matthew Auld
Conditionally allocate LMEM with 64K granularity, since 4K page support
for LMEM will be dropped on some platforms when using the PPGTT.
v2:
updated commit msg [Thomas]
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld
Signed-off-by: Stuart Summers
Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C
Cc: Joonas
On 12/8/21 15:34, Matthew Auld wrote:
On Wed, 8 Dec 2021 at 14:16, Ramalingam C wrote:
From: Matthew Auld
LMEM should be allocated at 64K granularity, since 4K page support will
eventually be dropped for LMEM when using the PPGTT.
s/will eventually be dropped/has been dropped/ as per
On Wed, 8 Dec 2021 at 14:16, Ramalingam C wrote:
>
> From: Matthew Auld
>
> LMEM should be allocated at 64K granularity, since 4K page support will
> eventually be dropped for LMEM when using the PPGTT.
s/will eventually be dropped/has been dropped/ as per Thomas' suggestion.
>
>
From: Matthew Auld
LMEM should be allocated at 64K granularity, since 4K page support will
eventually be dropped for LMEM when using the PPGTT.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld
Signed-off-by: Stuart Summers
Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi
Reviewed-by: Lucas De
On 12/7/21 17:51, Ramalingam C wrote:
From: Matthew Auld
LMEM should be allocated at 64K granularity, since 4K page support will
eventually be dropped for LMEM when using the PPGTT.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld
Signed-off-by: Stuart Summers
Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen
From: Matthew Auld
LMEM should be allocated at 64K granularity, since 4K page support will
eventually be dropped for LMEM when using the PPGTT.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld
Signed-off-by: Stuart Summers
Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi
Reviewed-by: Lucas De
