On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 05:45:01PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Apr 2020, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä
> >
> > No reason that I can see why we should enable TRANS_DDI_FUNC_CTL
> > before we set up the watermarks of confogiure the mbus stuff.
> > In fact reordering these
On Fri, 17 Apr 2020, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> No reason that I can see why we should enable TRANS_DDI_FUNC_CTL
> before we set up the watermarks of confogiure the mbus stuff.
> In fact reordering these seems to match the bspec sequence better,
> and cricually will allow us
Quoting Ville Syrjala (2020-04-17 14:47:18)
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> No reason that I can see why we should enable TRANS_DDI_FUNC_CTL
> before we set up the watermarks of confogiure the mbus stuff.
> In fact reordering these seems to match the bspec sequence better,
> and cricually will allow
From: Ville Syrjälä
No reason that I can see why we should enable TRANS_DDI_FUNC_CTL
before we set up the watermarks of confogiure the mbus stuff.
In fact reordering these seems to match the bspec sequence better,
and cricually will allow us to push the TRANS_DDI_FUNC_CTL enable
into the encoder
