On 03/12/2018 17:36, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-12-03 17:11:59)
On 03/12/2018 11:36, Chris Wilson wrote:
We inspect the requests under the assumption that they will be marked as
completed when they are removed from the queue. Currently however, in the
process of wedging
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-12-03 17:11:59)
>
> On 03/12/2018 11:36, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > We inspect the requests under the assumption that they will be marked as
> > completed when they are removed from the queue. Currently however, in the
> > process of wedging the requests will be removed
On 03/12/2018 11:36, Chris Wilson wrote:
We inspect the requests under the assumption that they will be marked as
completed when they are removed from the queue. Currently however, in the
process of wedging the requests will be removed from the queue before they
are completed, so rearrange the
We inspect the requests under the assumption that they will be marked as
completed when they are removed from the queue. Currently however, in the
process of wedging the requests will be removed from the queue before they
are completed, so rearrange the code to complete the fences before the
locks
