Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Add soft-pinning API for execbuffer

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 05:21:37PM +0530, akash goel wrote: > On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c > > index 19dd6b05ee1d..c35c9dc526e7 100644 > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Add soft-pinning API for execbuffer

On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 5:38 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 10:17:56AM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote: >> On 11/05/2015 09:51 AM, Kristian Høgsberg wrote: >> > On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 3:53 AM, Chris Wilson >> > wrote: >> >>

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Add soft-pinning API for execbuffer

On 11/06/2015 05:38 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 10:17:56AM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote: >> On 11/05/2015 09:51 AM, Kristian Høgsberg wrote: >>> On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 3:53 AM, Chris Wilson >>> wrote: Userspace can pass in an offset that it

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Add soft-pinning API for execbuffer

On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 10:17:56AM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On 11/05/2015 09:51 AM, Kristian Høgsberg wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 3:53 AM, Chris Wilson > > wrote: > >> Userspace can pass in an offset that it presumes the object is located > >> at. The kernel

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Add soft-pinning API for execbuffer

> -Original Message- > From: akash goel [mailto:akash.go...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2015 11:52 AM > To: Chris Wilson > Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Goel, Akash; Daniel, Thomas > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Add soft-pinning AP

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Add soft-pinning API for execbuffer

On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 3:53 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > Userspace can pass in an offset that it presumes the object is located > at. The kernel will then do its utmost to fit the object into that > location. The assumption is that userspace is handling its own object >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Add soft-pinning API for execbuffer

On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > Userspace can pass in an offset that it presumes the object is located > at. The kernel will then do its utmost to fit the object into that > location. The assumption is that userspace is handling its own object >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Add soft-pinning API for execbuffer

> -Original Message- > From: Daniel, Thomas > Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 23:11 > To: Daniel Vetter > Cc: Chris Wilson; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Belgaumkar, Vinay; Yang, > Rong R > Subject: RE: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Add soft-pinning

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Add soft-pinning API for execbuffer

> -Original Message- > From: Daniel Vetter [mailto:daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch] On Behalf Of Daniel Vetter > Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 4:08 PM > To: Daniel, Thomas > Cc: Chris Wilson; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Ad

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Add soft-pinning API for execbuffer

On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 01:59:12PM +, Daniel, Thomas wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk] > > Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2015 11:53 AM > > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > > Cc: Chris Wilson; Daniel, Thomas > > Subject: [PATCH 3/3]

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Add soft-pinning API for execbuffer

Userspace can pass in an offset that it presumes the object is located at. The kernel will then do its utmost to fit the object into that location. The assumption is that userspace is handling its own object locations (for example along with full-ppgtt) and that the kernel will rarely have to make

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Add soft-pinning API for execbuffer

> -Original Message- > From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk] > Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2015 11:53 AM > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Chris Wilson; Daniel, Thomas > Subject: [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Add soft-pinning API for execbuffer > > Userspace can pass in an

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Add soft-pinning API for execbuffer

Userspace can pass in an offset that it presumes the object is located at. The kernel will then do its utmost to fit the object into that location. The assumption is that userspace is handling its own object locations (for example along with full-ppgtt) and that the kernel will rarely have to make