Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Use a different vblank worker for atomic unpin

2023-11-17 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 09:14:31AM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 04:34:50PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > > For the atomic codepath we unpin_work in old_plane_state to unpin the > > old fb. As this happened after swapping state, this is allowed. > > > > Use the unpin_wo

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Use a different vblank worker for atomic unpin

2023-11-16 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 04:34:50PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > For the atomic codepath we unpin_work in old_plane_state to unpin the > old fb. As this happened after swapping state, this is allowed. > > Use the unpin_work only as a barrier, and keep doing the actual > unpinning in the atomic

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Use a different vblank worker for atomic unpin

2023-11-16 Thread Shankar, Uma
> -Original Message- > From: Intel-gfx On Behalf Of Maarten > Lankhorst > Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2023 9:05 PM > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Use a different vblank worker for > atomic unpin > >

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Use a different vblank worker for atomic unpin

2023-11-09 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
For the atomic codepath we unpin_work in old_plane_state to unpin the old fb. As this happened after swapping state, this is allowed. Use the unpin_work only as a barrier, and keep doing the actual unpinning in the atomic path. Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst --- .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel