Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915/edp: Be less aggressive about changing link config on eDP

2017-05-08 Thread Jim Bride
On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 11:41:25AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Sat, 06 May 2017, Jim Bride wrote: > > This set of changes has some history to them. There were several attempts > > to add what was called "fast link training" to i915, which actually wasn't > > fast

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915/edp: Be less aggressive about changing link config on eDP

2017-05-08 Thread Mika Kahola
On Fri, 2017-05-05 at 14:02 -0700, Jim Bride wrote: > This set of changes has some history to them.  There were several > attempts > to add what was called "fast link training" to i915, which actually > wasn't > fast link training as per the DP spec.  These changes were > > 5fa836a9d859

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915/edp: Be less aggressive about changing link config on eDP

2017-05-08 Thread Jani Nikula
On Sat, 06 May 2017, Jim Bride wrote: > This set of changes has some history to them. There were several attempts > to add what was called "fast link training" to i915, which actually wasn't > fast link training as per the DP spec. These changes were > > 5fa836a9d859

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915/edp: Be less aggressive about changing link config on eDP

2017-05-05 Thread Jim Bride
This set of changes has some history to them. There were several attempts to add what was called "fast link training" to i915, which actually wasn't fast link training as per the DP spec. These changes were 5fa836a9d859 ("drm/i915: DP link training optimization") 4e96c97742f4 ("drm/i915: eDP