On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 11:41:25AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Sat, 06 May 2017, Jim Bride wrote:
> > This set of changes has some history to them. There were several attempts
> > to add what was called "fast link training" to i915, which actually wasn't
> > fast
On Fri, 2017-05-05 at 14:02 -0700, Jim Bride wrote:
> This set of changes has some history to them. There were several
> attempts
> to add what was called "fast link training" to i915, which actually
> wasn't
> fast link training as per the DP spec. These changes were
>
> 5fa836a9d859
On Sat, 06 May 2017, Jim Bride wrote:
> This set of changes has some history to them. There were several attempts
> to add what was called "fast link training" to i915, which actually wasn't
> fast link training as per the DP spec. These changes were
>
> 5fa836a9d859
This set of changes has some history to them. There were several attempts
to add what was called "fast link training" to i915, which actually wasn't
fast link training as per the DP spec. These changes were
5fa836a9d859 ("drm/i915: DP link training optimization")
4e96c97742f4 ("drm/i915: eDP