Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/5] drm/dp: Implement I2C_M_STOP for i2c-over-aux

2018-12-12 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 11:30:30AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 06:47:00PM -0800, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote: > > On Fri, 2018-09-28 at 21:04 +0300, Ville Syrjala wrote: > > > From: Ville Syrjälä > > > > > > Consult the I2C_M_STOP flag to determine whether to set the MOT

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/5] drm/dp: Implement I2C_M_STOP for i2c-over-aux

2018-12-12 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 06:47:00PM -0800, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote: > On Fri, 2018-09-28 at 21:04 +0300, Ville Syrjala wrote: > > From: Ville Syrjälä > > > > Consult the I2C_M_STOP flag to determine whether to set the MOT bit > > or > > not. Makes it possible to send multiple messages in one go

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/5] drm/dp: Implement I2C_M_STOP for i2c-over-aux

2018-12-10 Thread Dhinakaran Pandiyan
On Fri, 2018-09-28 at 21:04 +0300, Ville Syrjala wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > Consult the I2C_M_STOP flag to determine whether to set the MOT bit > or > not. Makes it possible to send multiple messages in one go with > stop+start generated between the messages (as opposed nothing or >

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/5] drm/dp: Implement I2C_M_STOP for i2c-over-aux

2018-09-28 Thread Ville Syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä Consult the I2C_M_STOP flag to determine whether to set the MOT bit or not. Makes it possible to send multiple messages in one go with stop+start generated between the messages (as opposed nothing or repstart depending on whether thr address/rw changed). Not sure anyone has