On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 03:00:20PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 12/01/2017 11:33, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 09:51:03PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >>In preparation for the next patch to convert to using an anonymous union
> >>and leaving the excess bytes in the union
On 12/01/2017 11:33, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 09:51:03PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
In preparation for the next patch to convert to using an anonymous union
and leaving the excess bytes in the union uninitialised, we first need
to make sure we do not compare using those
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 09:51:03PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> In preparation for the next patch to convert to using an anonymous union
> and leaving the excess bytes in the union uninitialised, we first need
> to make sure we do not compare using those uninitialised bytes. We also
> want to
On 12/01/2017 10:05, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 07:14:55AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 12/01/2017 07:08, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 11/01/2017 21:51, Chris Wilson wrote:
In preparation for the next patch to convert to using an anonymous union
and leaving the excess bytes
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 07:14:55AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 12/01/2017 07:08, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> >
> >On 11/01/2017 21:51, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >>In preparation for the next patch to convert to using an anonymous union
> >>and leaving the excess bytes in the union uninitialised,
On 12/01/2017 07:08, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 11/01/2017 21:51, Chris Wilson wrote:
In preparation for the next patch to convert to using an anonymous union
and leaving the excess bytes in the union uninitialised, we first need
to make sure we do not compare using those uninitialised bytes.
On 11/01/2017 21:51, Chris Wilson wrote:
In preparation for the next patch to convert to using an anonymous union
and leaving the excess bytes in the union uninitialised, we first need
to make sure we do not compare using those uninitialised bytes. We also
want to preserve the compactness of
In preparation for the next patch to convert to using an anonymous union
and leaving the excess bytes in the union uninitialised, we first need
to make sure we do not compare using those uninitialised bytes. We also
want to preserve the compactness of the code, avoiding a second call to
memcmp or