On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 06:01:40PM +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 12 May 2015 at 17:57, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 04:07:14PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> >> Op 12-05-15 om 12:03 schreef Daniel Vetter:
> >> > On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Maarten Lankhorst
>
Hi,
On 12 May 2015 at 17:57, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 04:07:14PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> Op 12-05-15 om 12:03 schreef Daniel Vetter:
>> > On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Maarten Lankhorst
>> > wrote:
>> >> @@ -11953,16 +11930,14 @@ check_shared_dpll_state(struct
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 04:07:14PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 12-05-15 om 12:03 schreef Daniel Vetter:
> > On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Maarten Lankhorst
> > wrote:
> >> @@ -11953,16 +11930,14 @@ check_shared_dpll_state(struct drm_device *dev)
> >>
> >> for_each_intel
Op 12-05-15 om 12:03 schreef Daniel Vetter:
> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Maarten Lankhorst
> wrote:
>> @@ -11953,16 +11930,14 @@ check_shared_dpll_state(struct drm_device *dev)
>>
>> for_each_intel_crtc(dev, crtc) {
>> if (crtc->base.state->active &&
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Maarten Lankhorst
wrote:
> @@ -11953,16 +11930,14 @@ check_shared_dpll_state(struct drm_device *dev)
>
> for_each_intel_crtc(dev, crtc) {
> if (crtc->base.state->active &&
> intel_crtc_to_shared_dpll(crtc) == pll)
> -
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 04:25:09PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Small behavioral change: DPLL_DVO_2X_MODE may stay enabled during modeset
> for I830 if new state requires it, instead of being disabled and enabled
> again.
Imo this should be split in the remaing changes to get rid of ->active
Small behavioral change: DPLL_DVO_2X_MODE may stay enabled during modeset
for I830 if new state requires it, instead of being disabled and enabled
again.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 140 ++-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/inte
