Am 10.08.19 um 17:34 schrieb Chris Wilson:
> Allow for some users to surreptitiously insert lazy signal callbacks that
> do not depend on enabling the signaling mechanism around every fence.
> (The cost of interrupts is too darn high, to revive an old meme.)
> This means that we may have a cb_list
Allow for some users to surreptitiously insert lazy signal callbacks that
do not depend on enabling the signaling mechanism around every fence.
(The cost of interrupts is too darn high, to revive an old meme.)
This means that we may have a cb_list even if the signaling bit is not
enabled, so
