On ti, 2015-04-07 at 17:31 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> This is similar to remap_pfn_range(), and uses the recently refactor
> code to do the page table walking. The key difference is that is back
> propagates its error as this is required for use from within a pagefault
> handler. The other differ
This is similar to remap_pfn_range(), and uses the recently refactor
code to do the page table walking. The key difference is that is back
propagates its error as this is required for use from within a pagefault
handler. The other difference, is that it combine the page protection
from io-mapping,
