Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 41/53] drm/i915/bdw: Avoid non-lite-restore preemptions

2014-07-07 Thread Daniel Vetter
: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 41/53] drm/i915/bdw: Avoid non-lite-restore preemptions On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 04:37:59PM +0100, oscar.ma...@intel.com wrote: From: Oscar Mateo oscar.ma...@intel.com In the current Execlists feeding mechanism, full preemption is not supported yet: only lite

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 41/53] drm/i915/bdw: Avoid non-lite-restore preemptions

2014-06-18 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 04:37:59PM +0100, oscar.ma...@intel.com wrote: From: Oscar Mateo oscar.ma...@intel.com In the current Execlists feeding mechanism, full preemption is not supported yet: only lite-restores are allowed (this is: the GPU simply samples a new tail pointer for the context

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 41/53] drm/i915/bdw: Avoid non-lite-restore preemptions

2014-06-13 Thread oscar . mateo
From: Oscar Mateo oscar.ma...@intel.com In the current Execlists feeding mechanism, full preemption is not supported yet: only lite-restores are allowed (this is: the GPU simply samples a new tail pointer for the context currently in execution). But we have identified an scenario in which a full