On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 3:21 AM, Alan Stern st...@rowland.harvard.edu wrote:
On Sat, 9 Aug 2014, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Well it works currently. So where do you see the problem?
Sampling registers from an timer - in particular, we really do not want
to disable runtime pm whilst
On Saturday, August 09, 2014 10:53:03 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 3:21 AM, Alan Stern st...@rowland.harvard.edu wrote:
On Sat, 9 Aug 2014, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Well it works currently. So where do you see the problem?
Sampling registers from an timer - in
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 12:26:36PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 08:37:48AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 10:54:06AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 11:27:38AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 10:54:13PM
On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 10:20:40AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 12:26:36PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 08:37:48AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 10:54:06AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 11:27:38AM
On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 11:37:01AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 10:20:40AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 12:26:36PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 08:37:48AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 10:54:06AM
On Friday, August 08, 2014 11:37:01 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 10:20:40AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 12:26:36PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 08:37:48AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 10:54:06AM +0200,
On Friday, August 08, 2014 06:41:10 AM Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 11:37:01AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 10:20:40AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 12:26:36PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 08:37:48AM +0100,
On Sat, 9 Aug 2014, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Well it works currently. So where do you see the problem?
Sampling registers from an timer - in particular, we really do not want
to disable runtime pm whilst trying to monitor the impact of runtime pm.
In that case you can grab a
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 10:54:06AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 11:27:38AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 10:54:13PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 04:38:03PM +0100, oscar.ma...@intel.com wrote:
From: Oscar Mateo
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 08:37:48AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 10:54:06AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 11:27:38AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 10:54:13PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 04:38:03PM
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 11:27:38AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 10:54:13PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 04:38:03PM +0100, oscar.ma...@intel.com wrote:
From: Oscar Mateo oscar.ma...@intel.com
Or with a spinlock grabbed, because it might
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 10:54:13PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 04:38:03PM +0100, oscar.ma...@intel.com wrote:
From: Oscar Mateo oscar.ma...@intel.com
Or with a spinlock grabbed, because it might sleep, which is not
a nice thing to do. Instead, do the runtime_pm
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 04:38:03PM +0100, oscar.ma...@intel.com wrote:
From: Oscar Mateo oscar.ma...@intel.com
Or with a spinlock grabbed, because it might sleep, which is not
a nice thing to do. Instead, do the runtime_pm get/put together
with the create/destroy request, and handle the
From: Oscar Mateo oscar.ma...@intel.com
Or with a spinlock grabbed, because it might sleep, which is not
a nice thing to do. Instead, do the runtime_pm get/put together
with the create/destroy request, and handle the forcewake get/put
directly.
Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo oscar.ma...@intel.com
14 matches
Mail list logo
