Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: remove intel_pipe_set_base() (v3)

2014-11-18 Thread shuang . he
Tested-By: PRC QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact: shuang...@intel.com) -Summary- Platform: baseline_drm_intel_nightly_pass_rate-patch_applied_pass_rate BYT: pass/total=290/291-291/291 PNV:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: remove intel_pipe_set_base() (v3)

2014-11-18 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 06:10:39PM -0800, Matt Roper wrote: From: Gustavo Padovan gustavo.pado...@collabora.co.uk After some refactor intel_primary_plane_setplane() does the same as intel_pipe_set_base() so we can get rid of it and replace the calls with intel_primary_plane_setplane().

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: remove intel_pipe_set_base() (v3)

2014-11-18 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 18:10:39 -0800 Matt Roper matthew.d.ro...@intel.com wrote: -static int -intel_pipe_set_base(struct drm_crtc *crtc, int x, int y, - struct drm_framebuffer *fb) -{ I'm gonna miss this old function... But on the plus side I won't confuse pipe_set_base and

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: remove intel_pipe_set_base() (v3)

2014-11-17 Thread Matt Roper
From: Gustavo Padovan gustavo.pado...@collabora.co.uk After some refactor intel_primary_plane_setplane() does the same as intel_pipe_set_base() so we can get rid of it and replace the calls with intel_primary_plane_setplane(). v2: take Ville's comments: - get the right arguments for