In the previous patch we've implemented hwmode tracking a la i915 for
the vblank timestamp calculations. But that was just the basic
semantics, i915 has some nice sanity checks to make sure we keep
getting this right. Move them over too.
v2:
- WARN_ON_ONCE to avoid excessive spam (Ville)
- Really
On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 03:20:22PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 05:09:08PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 09:26:38AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > In the previous patch we've implemented hwmode tracking a la i915 for
> > > the vblank timestamp
On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 05:09:08PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 09:26:38AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > In the previous patch we've implemented hwmode tracking a la i915 for
> > the vblank timestamp calculations. But that was just the basic
> > semantics, i915 has some
On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 09:26:38AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> In the previous patch we've implemented hwmode tracking a la i915 for
> the vblank timestamp calculations. But that was just the basic
> semantics, i915 has some nice sanity checks to make sure we keep
> getting this right. Move them
In the previous patch we've implemented hwmode tracking a la i915 for
the vblank timestamp calculations. But that was just the basic
semantics, i915 has some nice sanity checks to make sure we keep
getting this right. Move them over too.
Cc: Ville Syrjälä