[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/vblank: Lock down vblank->hwmode more

2017-05-09 Thread Daniel Vetter
In the previous patch we've implemented hwmode tracking a la i915 for the vblank timestamp calculations. But that was just the basic semantics, i915 has some nice sanity checks to make sure we keep getting this right. Move them over too. v2: - WARN_ON_ONCE to avoid excessive spam (Ville) - Really

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/vblank: Lock down vblank->hwmode more

2017-05-08 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 03:20:22PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 05:09:08PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 09:26:38AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > In the previous patch we've implemented hwmode tracking a la i915 for > > > the vblank timestamp

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/vblank: Lock down vblank->hwmode more

2017-05-04 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 05:09:08PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 09:26:38AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > In the previous patch we've implemented hwmode tracking a la i915 for > > the vblank timestamp calculations. But that was just the basic > > semantics, i915 has some

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/vblank: Lock down vblank->hwmode more

2017-05-03 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 09:26:38AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > In the previous patch we've implemented hwmode tracking a la i915 for > the vblank timestamp calculations. But that was just the basic > semantics, i915 has some nice sanity checks to make sure we keep > getting this right. Move them

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/vblank: Lock down vblank->hwmode more

2017-05-03 Thread Daniel Vetter
In the previous patch we've implemented hwmode tracking a la i915 for the vblank timestamp calculations. But that was just the basic semantics, i915 has some nice sanity checks to make sure we keep getting this right. Move them over too. Cc: Ville Syrjälä