On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 09:47:56PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 03:19:42PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Looping when we keep track of this is silly. Only thing we have to
> > be careful is with sampling the connector count. To avoid inconsisten
> > results due to gcc
On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 03:19:42PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Looping when we keep track of this is silly. Only thing we have to
> be careful is with sampling the connector count. To avoid inconsisten
> results due to gcc re-computing this, use READ_ONCE.
Later on in the function we take the
Looping when we keep track of this is silly. Only thing we have to
be careful is with sampling the connector count. To avoid inconsisten
results due to gcc re-computing this, use READ_ONCE.
And to avoid surprising userspace, make sure we don't copy more
connectors than planned, and report the
