Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915/guc: Don't abort on CTB_UNUSED status

2022-07-28 Thread John Harrison
On 7/28/2022 17:00, Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele wrote: On 7/27/2022 7:42 PM, john.c.harri...@intel.com wrote: From: John Harrison When the KMD sends a CLIENT_RESET request to GuC (as part of the suspend sequence), GuC will mark the CTB buffer as 'UNUSED'. If the KMD then checked the CTB queue, it

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915/guc: Don't abort on CTB_UNUSED status

2022-07-28 Thread Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele
On 7/27/2022 7:42 PM, john.c.harri...@intel.com wrote: From: John Harrison When the KMD sends a CLIENT_RESET request to GuC (as part of the suspend sequence), GuC will mark the CTB buffer as 'UNUSED'. If the KMD then checked the CTB queue, it would see a non-zero status value and report the

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915/guc: Don't abort on CTB_UNUSED status

2022-07-28 Thread John Harrison
On 7/28/2022 12:06, Michal Wajdeczko wrote: On 28.07.2022 04:42, john.c.harri...@intel.com wrote: From: John Harrison When the KMD sends a CLIENT_RESET request to GuC (as part of the suspend sequence), GuC will mark the CTB buffer as 'UNUSED'. If the hmm, GuC shouldn't do that on

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915/guc: Don't abort on CTB_UNUSED status

2022-07-28 Thread Michal Wajdeczko
On 28.07.2022 04:42, john.c.harri...@intel.com wrote: > From: John Harrison > > When the KMD sends a CLIENT_RESET request to GuC (as part of the > suspend sequence), GuC will mark the CTB buffer as 'UNUSED'. If the hmm, GuC shouldn't do that on CLIENT_RESET, GuC shall only mark CTB as UNUSED

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915/guc: Don't abort on CTB_UNUSED status

2022-07-27 Thread John . C . Harrison
From: John Harrison When the KMD sends a CLIENT_RESET request to GuC (as part of the suspend sequence), GuC will mark the CTB buffer as 'UNUSED'. If the KMD then checked the CTB queue, it would see a non-zero status value and report the buffer as corrupted. Technically, no G2H messages should