On 10/10/2019 22:50, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2019-10-10 17:07:11)
Yeah, that's a fine interface actually.
One last thought for the interface, should we return the previous
config-id?
That limits the config-id space to long (min s32) so that we can report
the negative err
Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2019-10-10 17:07:11)
> Yeah, that's a fine interface actually.
One last thought for the interface, should we return the previous
config-id?
That limits the config-id space to long (min s32) so that we can report
the negative error code (or exclude the top 4095 values).
On 10/10/2019 18:44, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2019-10-10 16:22:25)
On 10/10/2019 00:19, Chris Wilson wrote:
From: Lionel Landwerlin
Introduce a new perf_ioctl command to change the OA configuration of the
active stream. This allows the OA stream to be reconfigured betwee
Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2019-10-10 16:22:25)
> On 10/10/2019 00:19, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > From: Lionel Landwerlin
> >
> > Introduce a new perf_ioctl command to change the OA configuration of the
> > active stream. This allows the OA stream to be reconfigured between
> > batch buffers, giving
On 10/10/2019 00:19, Chris Wilson wrote:
From: Lionel Landwerlin
Introduce a new perf_ioctl command to change the OA configuration of the
active stream. This allows the OA stream to be reconfigured between
batch buffers, giving greater flexibility in sampling. We inject a
request into the OA co
From: Lionel Landwerlin
Introduce a new perf_ioctl command to change the OA configuration of the
active stream. This allows the OA stream to be reconfigured between
batch buffers, giving greater flexibility in sampling. We inject a
request into the OA context to reconfigure the stream asynchronou