Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/9] drm/i915/dp: Protect link training with connection mutex

2017-09-19 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Tue, 2017-09-19 at 15:42 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 09:50:30PM +, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote: > > On Fri, 2017-09-15 at 13:10 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 04:57:29PM -0700, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote: > > > > The other instances of

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/9] drm/i915/dp: Protect link training with connection mutex

2017-09-19 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 09:50:30PM +, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote: > On Fri, 2017-09-15 at 13:10 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 04:57:29PM -0700, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote: > > > The other instances of link training are protected with > > > connection_mutex, so do the

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/9] drm/i915/dp: Protect link training with connection mutex

2017-09-18 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Fri, 2017-09-15 at 13:10 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 04:57:29PM -0700, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote: > > The other instances of link training are protected with > > connection_mutex, so do the same in check_mst_status() too. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/9] drm/i915/dp: Protect link training with connection mutex

2017-09-15 Thread Ausmus, James
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Manasi Navare wrote: > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 03:26:37PM -0700, Ausmus, James wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 4:57 PM, Dhinakaran Pandiyan >> wrote: >> > The other instances of link training are

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/9] drm/i915/dp: Protect link training with connection mutex

2017-09-15 Thread Manasi Navare
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 03:26:37PM -0700, Ausmus, James wrote: > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 4:57 PM, Dhinakaran Pandiyan > wrote: > > The other instances of link training are protected with > > connection_mutex, so do the same in check_mst_status() too. > > We don't

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/9] drm/i915/dp: Protect link training with connection mutex

2017-09-15 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Thu, 2017-09-14 at 15:26 -0700, Ausmus, James wrote: > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 4:57 PM, Dhinakaran Pandiyan > wrote: > > The other instances of link training are protected with > > connection_mutex, so do the same in check_mst_status() too. > > We don't seem to

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/9] drm/i915/dp: Protect link training with connection mutex

2017-09-15 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 04:57:29PM -0700, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote: > The other instances of link training are protected with > connection_mutex, so do the same in check_mst_status() too. > > Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan > --- >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/9] drm/i915/dp: Protect link training with connection mutex

2017-09-14 Thread Ausmus, James
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 4:57 PM, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote: > The other instances of link training are protected with > connection_mutex, so do the same in check_mst_status() too. We don't seem to be taking connection_mutex around intel_dp_start/stop_link_train in

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/9] drm/i915/dp: Protect link training with connection mutex

2017-09-12 Thread Dhinakaran Pandiyan
The other instances of link training are protected with connection_mutex, so do the same in check_mst_status() too. Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 4 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git