On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 09:42:53AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
> On 2019/10/15 下午10:37, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 11:37:17AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > On 2019/10/15 上午1:49, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 04:15:50PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > >
On 2019/10/15 下午10:37, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 11:37:17AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2019/10/15 上午1:49, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 04:15:50PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
There are hardware that can do virtio datapath offloading while having
its own con
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 11:37:17AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
> On 2019/10/15 上午1:49, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 04:15:50PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > There are hardware that can do virtio datapath offloading while having
> > > its own control path. This path tries to i
On 2019/10/15 上午1:49, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 04:15:50PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
There are hardware that can do virtio datapath offloading while having
its own control path. This path tries to implement a mdev based
unified API to support using kernel virtio driver to dr
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 04:15:50PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> There are hardware that can do virtio datapath offloading while having
> its own control path. This path tries to implement a mdev based
> unified API to support using kernel virtio driver to drive those
> devices. This is done by introd
Hi all:
There are hardware that can do virtio datapath offloading while having
its own control path. This path tries to implement a mdev based
unified API to support using kernel virtio driver to drive those
devices. This is done by introducing a new mdev transport for virtio
(virtio_mdev) and reg
