On Mon, 08 May 2017 13:07:10 +0300
Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> On la, 2017-05-06 at 02:58 +, Zhang, Xiong Y wrote:
> > >
> > > On ke, 2017-05-03 at 09:22 +, Zhang, Xiong Y wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +
On la, 2017-05-06 at 02:58 +, Zhang, Xiong Y wrote:
> >
> > On ke, 2017-05-03 at 09:22 +, Zhang, Xiong Y wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > + David and Jon
> > > > >
> > > > > On ti, 2017-04-25 at 18:34 +0800, Xiong Zhang wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The
> On ke, 2017-05-03 at 09:22 +, Zhang, Xiong Y wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > + David and Jon
> > > >
> > > > On ti, 2017-04-25 at 18:34 +0800, Xiong Zhang wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The blocking issue I see is that bisecting is still not pointing at
> > > > relevant commits. Both bisected commits
On ke, 2017-05-03 at 09:22 +, Zhang, Xiong Y wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > + David and Jon
> > >
> > > On ti, 2017-04-25 at 18:34 +0800, Xiong Zhang wrote:
> > >
> > > The blocking issue I see is that bisecting is still not pointing at
> > > relevant commits. Both bisected commits from Bugzilla
On to, 2017-04-27 at 05:54 +, Zhang, Xiong Y wrote:
> >
> > Also, was fixing the IGD driver loading with zero stolen memory
> > considered instead? All this information should exist in the commit
> > message.
> [Zhang, Xiong Y] IGD and i915 driver read pci config register 0x50 to getÂ
> the
> > + David and Jon
> >
> > On ti, 2017-04-25 at 18:34 +0800, Xiong Zhang wrote:
> >
> > The blocking issue I see is that bisecting is still not pointing at
> > relevant commits. Both bisected commits from Bugzilla are not related
> > to changes in stolen memory usage behavior. I'd assume a
> + David and Jon
>
> On ti, 2017-04-25 at 18:34 +0800, Xiong Zhang wrote:
>
> The blocking issue I see is that bisecting is still not pointing at
> relevant commits. Both bisected commits from Bugzilla are not related
> to changes in stolen memory usage behavior. I'd assume a successful
>
+ David and Jon
On ti, 2017-04-25 at 18:34 +0800, Xiong Zhang wrote:
The blocking issue I see is that bisecting is still not pointing at
relevant commits. Both bisected commits from Bugzilla are not related
to changes in stolen memory usage behavior. I'd assume a successful
bisect to land at the
Stolen memory isn't a standard pci resource and exists in RMRR which has
identity mapping in iommu table when host boot up, so IGD could access
stolen memory in host OS. While according to 'commit c875d2c1b808
("iommu/vt-d: Exclude devices using RMRRs from IOMMU API domains")',RMRR
isn't supported