Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] i915/gem_ctx_isolation: Bump support for Tigerlake

2019-10-04 Thread Mika Kuoppala
Chris Wilson writes: > There's very little variation in non-privileged registers for Tigerlake, > so we can mostly inherit the set from gen11. There is no whitelist at > present, so we do not need to add any special registers. > > v2: Add COMMON_SLICE_CHICKEN2, GEN9_SLICE_COMMON_ECO_CHICKEN1 and

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] i915/gem_ctx_isolation: Bump support for Tigerlake

2019-10-04 Thread Chris Wilson
There's very little variation in non-privileged registers for Tigerlake, so we can mostly inherit the set from gen11. There is no whitelist at present, so we do not need to add any special registers. v2: Add COMMON_SLICE_CHICKEN2, GEN9_SLICE_COMMON_ECO_CHICKEN1 and a variety of huc readonly

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] i915/gem_ctx_isolation: Bump support for Tigerlake

2019-10-04 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Stimson, Dale B (2019-10-04 00:26:24) > > On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 12:26:48PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > There's very little variation in non-privileged registers for Tigerlake, > > > so we can mostly inherit the set from gen11. There is no whitelist at > > > present, so we do not

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] i915/gem_ctx_isolation: Bump support for Tigerlake

2019-10-03 Thread Stimson, Dale B
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 12:26:48PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > There's very little variation in non-privileged registers for Tigerlake, > > so we can mostly inherit the set from gen11. There is no whitelist at > > present, so we do not need to add any special registers. > > > > Bugzilla:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] i915/gem_ctx_isolation: Bump support for Tigerlake

2019-10-02 Thread Petri Latvala
On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 12:26:48PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > There's very little variation in non-privileged registers for Tigerlake, > so we can mostly inherit the set from gen11. There is no whitelist at > present, so we do not need to add any special registers. > > Bugzilla:

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] i915/gem_ctx_isolation: Bump support for Tigerlake

2019-10-02 Thread Chris Wilson
There's very little variation in non-privileged registers for Tigerlake, so we can mostly inherit the set from gen11. There is no whitelist at present, so we do not need to add any special registers. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111599 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson ---