Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] igt: Make dependency on libunwind mandatory

On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 01:46:39PM +, Chris Wilson wrote: > Quoting Arkadiusz Hiler (2017-12-01 13:19:54) > > With Android support gone there is not much reason for keeping libunwind > > dependency optional. This also deals (cheaply!) with ifdefs covering > > huge portions of code, removing a

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] igt: Make dependency on libunwind mandatory

Quoting Arkadiusz Hiler (2017-12-01 13:19:54) > With Android support gone there is not much reason for keeping libunwind > dependency optional. This also deals (cheaply!) with ifdefs covering > huge portions of code, removing a placement minefield. > > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] igt: Make dependency on libunwind mandatory

Quoting Arkadiusz Hiler (2017-12-01 13:19:54) > With Android support gone there is not much reason for keeping libunwind > dependency optional. This also deals (cheaply!) with ifdefs covering > huge portions of code, removing a placement minefield. Could also force building with frame-pointers?

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] igt: Make dependency on libunwind mandatory

With Android support gone there is not much reason for keeping libunwind dependency optional. This also deals (cheaply!) with ifdefs covering huge portions of code, removing a placement minefield. Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin Cc: Chris Wilson