On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 07:39:00 -0700, Chris Wilson wrote:
>
> The poll() is proving unreliable, where our tests timeout without the
> spinner being terminated. Let's try a blocking read instead!
>
> Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/1676
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson
> Cc:
The poll() is proving unreliable, where our tests timeout without the
spinner being terminated. Let's try a blocking read instead!
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/1676
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson
Cc: "Dixit, Ashutosh"
---
lib/igt_dummyload.c | 12 ++--
1 file
The poll() is proving unreliable, where our tests timeout without the
spinner being terminated. Let's try a blocking read instead!
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/1676
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson
Cc: "Dixit, Ashutosh"
---
lib/igt_dummyload.c | 12 ++--
1 file
Quoting Dixit, Ashutosh (2020-04-14 22:37:44)
> On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 12:05:09 -0700, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >
> > The poll() is proving unreliable, where our tests timeout without the
> > spinner being terminated. Let's try a blocking read instead!
>
> Weird, wondering if all we need to do is set
On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 12:05:09 -0700, Chris Wilson wrote:
>
> The poll() is proving unreliable, where our tests timeout without the
> spinner being terminated. Let's try a blocking read instead!
Weird, wondering if all we need to do is set TFD_NONBLOCK on the fd?
>
> Closes:
The poll() is proving unreliable, where our tests timeout without the
spinner being terminated. Let's try a blocking read instead!
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/1676
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson
---
lib/igt_dummyload.c | 11 ++-
1 file changed, 6