Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 0/8] Vendor agnostic gputop

2023-01-26 Thread Kamil Konieczny
Hi, please rebase and resend, also please change commit subject to start with lib: or lib/[name of lib changed]: rest od commit description For example, in 3/8 instead of libdrmclients: Record client drm minor write: lib/igt_drm_clients: Record client drm minor If there are more lib changes,

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 0/8] Vendor agnostic gputop

2022-11-11 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
From: Tvrtko Ursulin This is a pile of patches which implements a rudimentary vendor agnostic gputop tool based of the new DRM spec as documented in Documentation/gpu/drm-usage-stats.rst. First part of the series is code refactoring which should be reasonably stable. I've tested it all while

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 0/8] Vendor agnostic gputop

2022-06-16 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
From: Tvrtko Ursulin Just a re-send having rebased on top of latest tree. Tvrtko Ursulin (8): lib: Extract igt_drm_clients from intel_gpu_top libdrmfdinfo: Allow specifying custom engine map libdrmclients: Record client drm minor libdrmclient: Support multiple DRM cards libdrmfdinfo:

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 0/8] Vendor agnostic gputop

2022-05-11 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
From: Tvrtko Ursulin This is a pile of patches which implements a rudimentary vendor agnostic gputop tool based of the new DRM spec as documented in Documentation/gpu/drm-usage-stats.rst. First part of the series is code refactoring which should be reasonably stable. I've tested it all while