Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 04/13] lib/igt_aux: Make procps optional

2017-05-16 Thread Chris Wilson
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 03:24:53PM +0200, Arkadiusz Hiler wrote: > Android does not have procps and it's not easy to compile it as a > dependency. > > We can provide alternative, "naive" implementation that just shells out > to external commands (i.e. pkill and lsof) in case we do not have the >

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 04/13] lib/igt_aux: Make procps optional

2017-05-16 Thread Arkadiusz Hiler
Android does not have procps and it's not easy to compile it as a dependency. We can provide alternative, "naive" implementation that just shells out to external commands (i.e. pkill and lsof) in case we do not have the library. v2: have separate functions for naive impls (J. Nikula) Cc: Jani

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 04/13] lib/igt_aux: Make procps optional

2017-04-19 Thread Jani Nikula
On Wed, 19 Apr 2017, Arkadiusz Hiler wrote: > Android does not have procps and it's not easy to compile it as a > dependency. > > We can provide alternative, "naive" implementation that just shells out > to external commands (i.e. pkill and lsof) in case we do not have

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 04/13] lib/igt_aux: Make procps optional

2017-04-19 Thread Arkadiusz Hiler
Android does not have procps and it's not easy to compile it as a dependency. We can provide alternative, "naive" implementation that just shells out to external commands (i.e. pkill and lsof) in case we do not have the library. Signed-off-by: Arkadiusz Hiler ---