Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 04/21] trace.pl: Virtual engine preemption support

2019-05-13 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 10/05/2019 13:55, Chris Wilson wrote: Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-05-08 13:10:41) From: Tvrtko Ursulin Use the 'completed?' tracepoint field to detect more robustly when a request has been preempted and remove it from the engine database if so. Otherwise the script can hit a scenario

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 04/21] trace.pl: Virtual engine preemption support

2019-05-10 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-05-08 13:10:41) > From: Tvrtko Ursulin > > Use the 'completed?' tracepoint field to detect more robustly when a > request has been preempted and remove it from the engine database if so. > > Otherwise the script can hit a scenario where the same global seqno will >

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 04/21] trace.pl: Virtual engine preemption support

2019-05-08 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
From: Tvrtko Ursulin Use the 'completed?' tracepoint field to detect more robustly when a request has been preempted and remove it from the engine database if so. Otherwise the script can hit a scenario where the same global seqno will be mentioned multiple times (on an engine seqno) which