On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 08:12:41PM +, Zanoni, Paulo R wrote:
> One of the things about our driver is that it tries to be very very
> conservative regarding the eDP timings, leading to waits longer than
> necessary for pretty much everyone. We tried to optimize this in the
> past, but due to
Em Seg, 2016-04-25 às 10:45 +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin escreveu:
> On 25/04/16 09:51, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 04:11:11PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 03:41:55PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > > >
> > > > From: Tvrtko Ursulin
On 25/04/16 09:51, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 04:11:11PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 03:41:55PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
I would argue it is enough to test one pipe in the BAT set.
Signed-off-by:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 04:11:11PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 03:41:55PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > From: Tvrtko Ursulin
> >
> > I would argue it is enough to test one pipe in the BAT set.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin
On Fri, 22 Apr 2016, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin
>
> I would argue it is enough to test one pipe in the BAT set.
FWIW BYT/CHV DSI may be fixed to port C which is fixed to pipe B,
skipping the test for pipe A.
BR,
Jani.
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 03:41:55PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin
>
> I would argue it is enough to test one pipe in the BAT set.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin
> ---
> tests/kms_pipe_crc_basic.c | 23
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
I would argue it is enough to test one pipe in the BAT set.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin
---
tests/kms_pipe_crc_basic.c | 23 +--
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git