Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 3/5] kms_frontbuffer_tracking: Skip on unreliable CRC.

2015-12-03 14:39 GMT-02:00 Rodrigo Vivi : > Even with all sink crc re-works we still have platforms > where after 6 vblanks it is unable to calculate the > sink crc. But if we don't get the sink crc it isn't true > that test failed, but that we have no ways to say test >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 3/5] kms_frontbuffer_tracking: Skip on unreliable CRC.

2015-12-03 17:44 GMT-02:00 Vivi, Rodrigo : > On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 15:05 -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote: >> 2015-12-03 14:39 GMT-02:00 Rodrigo Vivi : >> > Even with all sink crc re-works we still have platforms >> > where after 6 vblanks it is unable to

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 3/5] kms_frontbuffer_tracking: Skip on unreliable CRC.

On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 15:05 -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > 2015-12-03 14:39 GMT-02:00 Rodrigo Vivi : > > Even with all sink crc re-works we still have platforms > > where after 6 vblanks it is unable to calculate the > > sink crc. But if we don't get the sink crc it isn't

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 3/5] kms_frontbuffer_tracking: Skip on unreliable CRC.

On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 17:59 -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > 2015-12-03 17:44 GMT-02:00 Vivi, Rodrigo : > > On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 15:05 -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > > > 2015-12-03 14:39 GMT-02:00 Rodrigo Vivi : > > > > Even with all sink crc re-works we

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 3/5] kms_frontbuffer_tracking: Skip on unreliable CRC.

Even with all sink crc re-works we still have platforms where after 6 vblanks it is unable to calculate the sink crc. But if we don't get the sink crc it isn't true that test failed, but that we have no ways to say test passed or failed. So let's print a message and move forward in case sink crc