On Monday, 11 September 2023 13:57:29 CEST Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 11:28:32 +0200
> Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
>
> > Hi Mauro,
> >
> > Thanks for review.
> >
> > On Monday, 11 September 2023 10:52:51 CEST Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > > On Fri, 8 Sep 2023 14:32:39
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 11:28:32 +0200
Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> Hi Mauro,
>
> Thanks for review.
>
> On Monday, 11 September 2023 10:52:51 CEST Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > On Fri, 8 Sep 2023 14:32:39 +0200
> > Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> >
> > > In a body of a subtest with dynamic
Hi Mauro,
Thanks for review.
On Monday, 11 September 2023 10:52:51 CEST Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Sep 2023 14:32:39 +0200
> Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
>
> > In a body of a subtest with dynamic sub-subtests, it is illegal to call
> > igt_fail() and its variants from outside of a
On Fri, 8 Sep 2023 14:32:39 +0200
Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> In a body of a subtest with dynamic sub-subtests, it is illegal to call
> igt_fail() and its variants from outside of a dynamic sub-subtest body.
> On the other hand, it is perfectly legal to call either igt_skip() and
> friends or
In a body of a subtest with dynamic sub-subtests, it is illegal to call
igt_fail() and its variants from outside of a dynamic sub-subtest body.
On the other hand, it is perfectly legal to call either igt_skip() and
friends or __igt_abort() or its variant from there.
In the current implementation
