Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v3 3/6] tests/gem_scheduler: Add gem_scheduler test

2016-03-19 Thread Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
On 17/03/16 08:49, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote: On 10/03/16 11:03, Derek Morton wrote: This is intended to test the scheduler behaviour is correct. The subtests are -basic Tests that batch buffers of the same priority submitted to a ring execute in the order they are submitted. -read

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v3 3/6] tests/gem_scheduler: Add gem_scheduler test

2016-03-18 Thread Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
On 10/03/16 11:03, Derek Morton wrote: This is intended to test the scheduler behaviour is correct. The subtests are -basic Tests that batch buffers of the same priority submitted to a ring execute in the order they are submitted. -read Submits a batch buffer with a read dependency to a buffer

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v3 3/6] tests/gem_scheduler: Add gem_scheduler test

2016-03-10 Thread Derek Morton
This is intended to test the scheduler behaviour is correct. The subtests are -basic Tests that batch buffers of the same priority submitted to a ring execute in the order they are submitted. -read Submits a batch buffer with a read dependency to a buffer object to a ring which is held in the